Whether any of the speed tests I tried truly represent real-world network traffic is debatable. One of the dozen-or-so tests recorded a download speed of 10.4Mbps, and several of Ookla's Flash-based test results exceeded 12.5Mbps for downloads.Īfter conducting more than 100 network speed tests from many different providers over the course of several days, I'm confident my ISP is delivering speeds approximating - and perhaps exceeding - those it promised when I signed up for the service. With only one exception, all the download tests I ran at the AT&T Internet Speed Test and at Ookla's indicated speeds of 11.5Mbps or greater. The FCC's test also requires that you supply your street address.) (Note that the Java-based network tester at the FCC's runs on the Measurement Labs platform, which doesn't support the Safari, Google Chrome, or Opera browsers. The company's speed tests are provided by Ookla, as are the tests at many other network providers. Not surprisingly, the highest consistent speeds were reported when I ran the tests offered by my ISP, AT&T. The results of the HTML5-based speed tests conducted at Bandwidth Place ranged from 5Mbps to 11Mbps, those at exhibited a similar range, and the Flash-based tests at ZDNet's Broadband Speed Test recorded speeds from 5.8Mbps to 11.4Mbps. 's download scores in both its single- and multithread tests exhibited a bit more range than those of Speakeasy's Speed Test, but they averaged about 11.2Mbps. After running several tests over a span of days, all of Speed Test's download results were within a few kilobits of 11.5Mbps. Of course, the services' tests may be consistently wrong. The most consistent test results were recorded at Speakeasy's Flash-based Speed Test and at 's HTML5-based tester. Others point out that multithread tests such as those used by Ookla ( and branded by many ISPs) don't represent real-world network traffic as well as single-thread tests. Many experts claim HTML5-based speed tests are more accurate than tests that use Java and Adobe Flash. For more information, see NetDuma’s How to test your Internet Ping knowledge base article.Does the type of speed test make a difference? To validate your Nighthawk Pro Gaming router’s performance, you can use PingPlotter software to test your connection quality and verify your QoS settings. In fact, Nighthawk Pro Gaming routers include hardware acceleration that enable your router to perform QoS at gigabit speeds, significantly faster than many competing routers. The DPI should not affect the results as no ping spikes actually occur DPI does not interfere with or slow down your Internet connection. The reason why DSLReports returns a rating of “A” instead of “A+” is because their speed test misreads your router's DumaOS Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) feature, which analyzes the first eight packets of a new connection.ĭSLReports misunderstands DPI for a small ping spike that translates to a lower rating on their speed test. Theoretically, if your Internet connection is functioning optimally, the DSLReports speed test should return the best possible buffer bloat rating, “A+.” However, DSLReports might return an “A” rating instead. Part of the DSLReports speed test measures how well your Internet connection handles network congestion, also known as “buffer bloat.” To test the how well your Internet connection handles buffer bloat, the DSLReports speed test creates congestion and then tests your ping.ĭumaOS on your Nighthawk Pro Gaming router contains quality of service (QoS) features that prevent buffer bloat from building up. The DSLReports Speed Test website is a commonly recommended method to test your Internet connection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |